September 27th, 2006

Big Blow to CITGO

I found the following in The Conservative Voice. It looks like 7 Eleven is dumping CITGO gas.

7 Eleven Inc. announced Wednesday that it is canceling its relationship with Venezuela’s government-backed CITGO. Approximately 2,100 7 Eleven convenience stores nationwide sell the CITGO product.  The move is said to be in response to Venezuelan strongman leader Hugo Chavez’ comments at the UN, which vilified President Bush by calling him “the devil” and also disparaged the United States. 

7 Eleven spokesperson Margaret Chabris said: “Regardless of politics, we sympathize with many Americans’ concern over derogatory comments about our country and its leadership recently made by Venezuela’s president Hugo Chavez.”

As soon as they switch from Citgo, they have my business. As soon as they switch from Citgo, they have my business. Looks like the Boycott has got some attention.

As soon as they switch from Citgo, they have my business. Looks like the Boycott has got some attention.

Trackback URL for this post: http://www.yacrwb.org/2006/09/27/big-blow-to-citgo/trackback/

September 27th, 2006

The NIE Report Release: What dose it say?

As promised the NIE report, which has been a rallying point for the anti-Bush crowd was released, at least partially, last night. In total, only about 3 pages of the 31 page report where released. I am glad that the majority of the report has remained classified, as this type of report should not be used as a piece in a political game.

But I digress – to the point. What did the NIE report have to say? I think the Chicago Tribune summed it up best:

It does indeed make the sobering assessment that “the Iraq jihad is shaping a new generation of terrorist leaders and operatives … ” It says “the Iraq conflict has become the `cause celebre’ for jihadists, breeding a deep resentment of U.S. involvement in the Muslim world and cultivating supporters for the global jihadist movement.” But it says far more than that.

It says that the jihadist movement is being fueled by the slow pace of political, economic and social reforms in Muslim nations, by corruption and injustice there, and by anti-U.S. sentiment among most Muslims.

It says that success for jihadists in Iraq “would inspire more fighters to continue the struggle elsewhere”–a pointed argument for why the U.S.-backed government in Iraq must prevail.

It says that democratic reforms, more responsive political systems and greater pluralism could create opportunities for the jihadists to exploit–but could ultimately erode their support.

Finally, a bit of good news: U.S. counterterrorism efforts “have seriously damaged the leadership of Al Qaeda and disrupted its operations…”

In other words, we’re in for a very long struggle. The assessment that Iraq has become a “cause celebre’ for jihadists? That’s probably true. American-led coalition forces are attacker-occupiers, first planting and now defending democracy amid a regional constellation of monarchies, theocracies and dictatorships. The U.S. has reversed its prior policy of encouraging euphemistic “stability.”

Tell me, Mr. Democrat – what does crow taste like?

The bottom line: The US, with President Bush at the helm, is doing the correct thing – regardless of how difficult and unglamorous it is. It is a tough rode made tougher by partisan attacks from the Left who are unable to see beyond the next election. We must fight to win here, our future depends upon it, and politics be damned.

I don’t expect to see apologies from Congressional Democrats who cried foul, waving this supposed banner justifying their cowardly position on the war in Iraq, but they should. Shame on them for putting political gain before the good of our country, shame on them for relentlessly attacking our Commander an Chief, and shame on them for publishing and leaking a classified intelligence report.

To be fair, I also need to add one more shame to that list: Shame on President Bush for declassifying even a portion of a US Intelligence report to rebuff political pressure.  It was the right thing to do for the party, but not a precedent we want to set. Lets make an example of this group, and nail them to the wall for the initial release.

Trackback URL for this post: http://www.yacrwb.org/2006/09/27/the-nie-report-release-what-dose-it-say/trackback/

September 27th, 2006

Reverse Doe Vs. Bolton?

Revealing the ACLU posted an article on the possible reversal of Doe. Vs. Bolton, a landmark abortion case.

Important to note is that the plaintiff (Doe in the original case) is alleging severe misconduct by the ACLU.

The complete article can be found here.

Trackback URL for this post: http://www.yacrwb.org/2006/09/27/reverse-doe-vs-bolton/trackback/

September 27th, 2006

ACLU not so SWIFT

If you remember SWIFT is NSA program to track financial exchanges to find links with terrorist funding. It is the same program that the New York Times leaked in late June.

 

The ACLU is renewing attacks against the SWIFT program, this time attacking the 3rd party set up to audit the program.

 

A more detailed commentary is available on Revealing the ACLU.

 

The original report, from UPI, can be found here.

Trackback URL for this post: http://www.yacrwb.org/2006/09/27/aclu-not-so-swift/trackback/

|