Cross Posted from Revealing the ACLU: Last month I wrote about a group called STAT (Stop The ACLU Tyranny), who was fighting to preserve the Nativity Scene in the city of Berkley. The city Nativity Scene, like so many others, had come under attack from the ACLU.
Well, Monday Night The Berkley City Council voted on this issue.
The Berkley City Council voted 6-1 Monday night to give the city’s nativity scene to the Berkley Clergy Association for display at local churches.
The council’s options, narrowed from five originally, were either give the Christmas display to the clergy or secularize the nativity.
Before the vote was cast, the council listened to about two hours of citizen comments, including arguments on Supreme Court precedence, religious freedom, community acceptance of others beliefs, watering down Christmas, decoration dollars, minority rights, national agendas, and individual civil liberties.
Berkley clergy members spoke against secularizing the display, saying that only adds fire to flames of an already watered down Christmas.
While I agree with core statement by the clergy involved, I cannot think that the resolution is acceptable. This was not a win for the conservative side of establishment law, as the ACLUs ultimate desire of removing Christian symbols from public property has succeeded. The rights for a church to have a Nativity was never in question.
I do agree that it should be moved rather than secularized. In a move the core message is maintained. When secularized the core meaning of the Christian symbol is removed, and it becomes meaningless.
I am glad that STAT, who supported the Nativity on Public property, agreed and kept with the fight until the end.
The leader of the group Stop the ACLU Tyranny, Georgia Halloran, showed up with a lawyer from the Thomas More Law Center to renew her side of the debate, that she believed the nativity should remain on city property.
“I would say the city capitulated to the ACLU, no matter what was said up there,” she said after the vote. Her group has some options that were mentioned during the meeting, such as a ballot referendum or lawsuit against the city.
“We are not finished,” Halloran said.
I am glad STAT is intending to fight on, and that they now have some high quality support in the Thomas Moore Law Center. However, now that the City has made a decision, the battle has become exponentially more difficult.


